z

It’s hard to tell which parts of state’s constitution are still valid


An editorial series
Second in the series

   Among its many faults, the 1901 Alabama Constitution reeks of a 19th century mindset. It is based on the 1875 state constitution, and many parts of it were designed to bar blacks and poor whites from the voting booth.

   Gov. Emmett O'Neal noticed its preoccupation with black suffrage as early as 1914, saying “little consideration was given to reform.” He said the state was operating then with a constitution “framed to meet conditions that can never exist again.”

   Federal law and court rulings in the last century have superseded several sections of the constitution. While “miscegenation laws” remain a part of the constitution for now, the laws have not been enforced for decades.

   But more significantly for 21st century Alabamians are the limitations the constitution places on local governments. Allowing local governments to rule themselves is called “home rule,” and many people view it as a risky proposition.

   They may vote for the county commissioners, but they don’t want the commissioners to be able to create new taxes. Many commissioners and commission candidates do not want that kind of home rule either - probably because they do not want to take direct blame for an unpopular action like taxation.

   But setting taxation aside, home rule is the only reasonable way to deal with local issues like polling hours, repealing bounties on trapped beavers, setting local court costs and other purely local matters that now must be addressed by state lawmakers, and in some cases voters in the form of constitutional amendments.

   Many of our 661 amendments nullify some sections of the constitution. Some amendments amended previous amendments.

   It takes a legal scholar as well as a scorecard to keep up with which parts of the 1901 document remain valid.

   Most of the arguments for rewriting the constitution are almost as old as the constitution itself. O’Neal called for constitutional reform in 1914. Gov. James E. Folsom (1947-1951, 1955-1959) tried a number of times to get the Legislature to call for a constitutional convention. He was unsuccessful. In 1969, Gov. Albert Brewer initiated legislation establishing a constitutional commission, but no rewrite ever came about.

   More than a quarter-century after that commission issued its report, there is serious discussion of rewriting the constitution again. Citizens for Constitutional Reform and other organizations are ready to support and try to spur efforts.

   Two bills calling for a rewrite died in the Legislature this year. Sen. Roger Bedford submitted a draft 2000 Alabama Constitution to the Legislature in May. Whether Bedford's is the framework we need for state government remains to be seen.

   Whether the constitution should be rewritten in a convention, or revised piecemeal, one section or article at a time, are unanswered questions as well.

   Bedford says the draft is designed to provide a readable constitution that maintains the workable provisions of the 1901 constitution and removes the inefficient and outdated provisions that “inhibit good government.”

   These should be the goals of whatever method is used to revise the constitution.

Next: Constitution: Alabama's Solution

Reprinted with Permission from The Gadsden Times.

Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 34
Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0034


E-mail: accr@constitutionalreform.org
Home Page  |  Return to Top of Page