By Bob Johnson
The
Associated Press
August 16, 2001
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) -- The group leading the push for a new Alabama
constitution wants the document written in a statewide convention
and not by the Legislature.
"The people of Alabama, through a convention of their
elected delegates, should be the ones to write a new constitution,"
Thomas Corts, president of Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform,
said at a news conference Thursday.
The organization has been pushing for a new document
to replace the state's 1901 Constitution for more than a year, but
had not previously endorsed a method for writing it.
A "convention of citizens" would not be as likely to
fall to the pressure of special interest groups as would members of
the Legislature, Corts said. He said Alabama voters also might be
more likely to ratify a Consititution written at a citizens' convention.
"As citizens become more aware, that might lead them
to be more positive when they vote," Corts said.
State Rep. Mac Gipson, R-Prattville, has introduced a
bill in the Legislature for the past several years calling for a statewide
constitutional convention. He said Thursday he is glad to see Corts'
organization getting behind the idea of a convention.
"I think the convention is the only way this has a chance
of getting done," Gipson said.
"We have proven the last two years that we can't do it
legislatively." He was referring to efforts in the Legislature to
rewrite two of the least controversial sections of the constitution.
"We couldn't even get that through both houses of the
Legislature," Gipson said.
An opponent of the effort to rewrite the Constitution,
Joyce Perrin of Tuscaloosa, said she's worried about what kind of
document delegates to a convention would write.
"They can do anything they want to do at a convention.
There's not a whole lot that's wrong with the Constitution that needs
to be rewritten," said Perrin, a member of the Association for Judeo-Christian
Values. She plans to debate Corts today during a meeting of the West
Alabama Leadership Forum at Stillman College in Tuscaloosa.
Opponents of a new constitution have said it might be
used to legalize gambling and to raise taxes. Corts said he can't
imagine elected delegates to a convention legalizing gambling.
"I certainly would not be behind this if I thought that
was true," said Corts, president of Southern Baptist-owned Samford
University in Birmingham.
Gipson said delegates to a convention would be more likely
to keep taxes low and gambling illegal than would the Legislature.
"A panel of citizens would be less likely to approve
gambling. The citizens have already said they don't want that," Gipson
said, referring to the defeat two years ago of a proposed statewide
lottery. "And I don't forsee most folks I talk to putting new taxes
in the constitution."
At the news conference Thursday, Corts endorsed several
basic principles his group would like to see in the new constitution.
He said the new document should keep the preamble to the 1901 Constitution,
which invokes "the favor and guidance of Almighty God."
Corts said he also favors keeping the current Judicial
Article to the Constitution, that was approved by state voters in
1973, and a statement of citizen rights similar to the Bill of Rights
in the U.S. Constitution.
Perrin said she's not sure those principles would survive
a convention.
"If you open the Constitution up to a convention, there's no
guarantee any of that will be in it when they finish."
Return
to: Editorials Index