|
|||||||||||
|
Constitutional convention idea should be on
ballot The whole purpose is that Alabama has the oldest constitution of any state in America, he said. In reality, it does not take into consideration anything that any legislator considers as progressive. We need a doctrine of law that relates to todays Alabama. Granted, some will claim thats what amendments are for, but lets get real and clean up this doctrine which still includes law that applies to times before the family automobile and television. This is not 1901. We claim we want to be progressive, not regressive. Heres another chance. Little, a Democrat, made a resolution Tuesday in the Senate to hold a constitutional convention, complete with delegates, to decide how much of this antiquated constitution needs to be re-written. If passed in the Senate, it must also be passed in the House and then
approved by the Secretary of State before it can be placed as a referendum
on a public ballot. If Alabamians feel such a convention is necessary, then it should come to pass. If they do not, the point is practically moot, but Little can sleep well at night knowing he played a vital part in placing the idea in the hands of the people. Some may claim that legislators elected to represent Alabamians in Montgomery are doing that job for them, but isnt it time to give the voters a real say-so in this important matter rather than letting a small group of well-dressed men and women at the State House make this decision for them? Little shouldnt have to bring this issue before the Legislature each session only to have it shot down, but we commend him for championing this worthy cause. Its time the people of Alabama had a choice whether or not they feel a convention to re-write the constitution is necessary. Its time for our Legislature to recognize this need and do something about it for a change.
|
|||||||||||
| Top | Home | |||||||||||