|
||||||||||||||||||
|
REFORM IN THE NEWS Our view:
Scare tactics don't justify constitution vote Boo! No, its not Halloween. Its the time when the Alabama Legislature is in session, and it annually blocks the effort to have the people of this state decide whether they want to call a convention to write a new constitution. And instead of goblins and ghouls, lawmakers employ the scariest of tactics
around these parts the mere mention of taxes and gambling
to ensure that the bill never quite comes to a vote. |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
New hope
for reform House backers actually got more votes than their opponents What happened to constitutional reform this week in the state House of
Representatives could not, by any stretch, be called a victory. But even
in a lopsided loss, reform advocates saw a glimmer of possibility. A Broken
Legislature The 2008 session points out the need for constitutional reform. Constitution
and budget woes A budget crisis has revealed just how our state Constitution makes it
difficult, if not impossible, to respond to state needs in an effective
and efficient manner. Even more evidence of why a new Constitution is
an urgent matter. State House
leader confident in constitutional convention bill MONTGOMERY The question of calling a convention to overhaul Alabama's 107-year-old constitution soon will be before state lawmakers. But getting it passed will be the ultimate test of political muscle and
of a grassroots constitutional reform movement's ability to change the
minds of legislators. Is this evidence? Opponents of constitutional reform argue that there is no clear evidence that the people of Alabama want it. "Evidence" is in the eye of the beholder. However, it is safe to say that until now opponents have felt they could safely ignore cries for constitutional reform because there was little, if any, evidence of statewide support. That may have changed. A recent poll conducted by the Capital Survey Research Center found that
a majority of Alabama citizens want the Legislature to pass pending legislation
that would allow the people to vote on whether or not to hold a constitutional
convention. Alabamians
clearly want to vote Maybe most Alabamians want to see a constitutional convention held to draft a new constitution to replace the 1901 document that still forms the organic body of law for our state. Maybe they don't. What they plainly do want, however, is the chance to decide whether to
hold a convention. A new statewide survey indicates widespread support
for holding an election on the convention question. The survey shows levels
of support throughout a broad demographic range of Alabamians that, if
cited as election results, would be seen as landslides. The people
of Alabama want to vote on whether a citizens convention should draft
a new constitution, but will the Legislature let them? If there's a popular groundswell rising, many Alabama lawmakers will knock each other out of the way to be the first to catch the wave. So here are some poll results that ought to make lawmakers break out
the surfboards: Almost two-thirds of Alabamians surveyed say they want
their lawmakers to vote for a bill that would let voters decide whether
they want a constitutional convention to draft a new state constitution. Return power
to state voters There are arguments to be made for and against a convention to draft a new Alabama constitution. The only certainty is that the current document, enacted in 1901, needs to be replaced. Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform wraps up all the major arguments: The 1901 Constitution restricts local democracy; it locks in an unfair tax system; it hinders economic development; it limits budget flexibility; it is the longest known constitution in the world; and it has undemocratic origins. At long last, Alabamians may have a chance to vote on whether to call a convention to draft a new state constitution. The Constitution and Elections Committee of the state House of Representatives voted 9-4 this week for a bill for a statewide referendum concurrent with the 2010 primary elections. The bill has a long way to go. It faces a vote in the full House, approval
by the Senate and endorsement by the governor. Our view:
House should let people vote Its easy to agree with state Rep. Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham, when he talks about the call for a rewrite of Alabamas constitution. As a House committee on Wednesday considered letting voters decide whether they want a convention to rewrite the states constitution, Newton asked members a question. Whether you agree we need a new constitution or vehemently disagree, it boils down to one simple thing do you trust the same people who elected you to the Legislature to make the decision?, Newton asked the House Constitution and Elections Committee. On a 9-4 vote, the answer was in the affirmative. Alabama House
panel votes for plan to let voters decide whether to call a convention
to draft a new state constitution MONTGOMERY - State voters would decide whether to call a convention to draft a new state constitution, under a plan that took an early step toward approval Wednesday. The Constitution and Elections Committee of the state House of Representatives voted 9-4 for the proposal. Democrats voted for it. Republicans opposed it. State Rep. Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham, sponsored House Bill 308 and said he hopes the full House will vote on it within three weeks. Newton, the second-ranking House member, tried but failed the past two years to get the House to pass a convention bill. "I hope we have the votes this year," Newton said. If his bill is approved by at least 53 of the 105 House members and at
least 18 of the 35 senators, state voters would decide in June 2010 whether
to call a convention. Key decisions
should rest with people There is room for disagreement as to whether a constitutional convention
is the best way to develop a new state constitution to replace Alabama's
flawed 1901 document. However, it is hard to argue against allowing Alabamians
to decide whether a convention is what they want. Seeing the
'groundswell' Alabama is locked in convention detention, a prison saying the right thing and doing the right thing are miles apart. Amid considerable fanfare and high expectations, a bill has been introduced in the state Legislature to allow Alabamians to decide, by vote, if we should hold a convention to rewrite the state's antiquated and inadequate Constitution. Once again, legislators lined up to testify about their belief in the will of the people and how the only way the people's will could be known was to let the people vote on such issues. As you can expect, that's when the back-peddling began. Listen closely
and you can hear how legislators can turn democracy on its head. Annexations?
Look a little deeper A newspaper prides itself on reporting issues in its community. In many cases, nobody else covers what we cover - local city councils, the county commissions, the Alabama Legislature. And not everyone who reads the paper pays attention to the details. I
think that's what is happening with regard to a proposal before the Legislature
to keep outside cities - namely, Huntsville and Madison, but Decatur,
too - from annexing land in Limestone County without the voters in that
county having the final say. At least
we have progress in the Legislature Believe it or not, there are some good bills making their way through the Alabama Legislature. Last week, the Senate Constitution, Campaign Finance, Ethics and Elections Committee approved a ban on PAC-to-PAC transfers. The bill contains loopholes, but its a start. At the same time, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved legislation to implement a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that bans capital punishment for people with mental retardation. The court ruled six years ago but Alabama has failed to respond by setting appropriate guidelines. Even though its long overdue, the interest is welcome. The same committee also passed a bill to let Alabamians vote on whether they want to rewrite the states 1901 constitution. The full Senate now will consider the proposal, but its chances are not considered good. It has died year after year. One of the major goals of constitutional reformers is decentralizing the power that the framers of the 1901 Constitution placed in Montgomery. Despite their protests that they are not interested in micromanaging local governments, lawmakers have been extremely reluctant to let go of any of their authority. Thats what makes a bill that won the approval of the Senate elections
committee last week so interesting. It would increase the number of legislators
needed to force a statewide vote on a local constitutional amendment. What could
be more patriotic? THE ISSUE: The Legislature should let Alabama voters decide whether they want a citizens convention to write a new state constitution. In a burst of patriotism (opportunism?), the state House of Representatives on Tuesday passed a bill that would allow homeowners to fly the American flag, even if neighborhood covenants or rules ban such displays. The bill now goes to the Senate, and even that bickering bunch seems unlikely to turn down this bill. After all, what could be more patriotic? (Opportunistic?) Well, how about letting the people of this great state vote? We saw on Feb. 5 what happens when Alabamians are motivated to go to the polls. They turned out in record numbers to have their say in presidential primaries that, for the first time in more than two decades, actually mattered. The Legislature has a chance to show some real patriotism with a bill
that would let Alabama voters decide whether they want a convention of
citizens to draft a new state constitution. Again, constitutional
reform advocates face an uphill fight For those who believe that government can be made better and that reform is one way to do it, in this state such beliefs require persistence and patience. Fortunately, the citizens who recognize the crying need for a new state constitution are in possession of both qualities, and year in and year out, they are willing to act on them. Even so, making things better is never easy. Why they are
afraid Once again, convention opponents are preparing their defense. Expecting this opposition, Speaker Pro Tempore Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham, who introduced the bill in the House, remarked, "my problem has been that I don't know what they are afraid of." It's obvious that Newton is not being serious, and that he knows those who oppose a vote on a constitutional convention are afraid that if that vote is held, they, the opponents, would lose. And if they lost, they are afraid that a constitutional convention might
draw up a document that would take from them the historical advantages
that have made their special interests so special. State constitution
on agenda MONTGOMERY -- In what is close to becoming an annual tradition, bills and amendments that would give the public a chance to change the state's 1901 Constitution began stirring this week in the Legislature. An amendment introduced by state Rep. Paul DeMarco, R-Homewood, to rewrite the document's banking article passed the House Constitution and Elections Committee Thursday. A second amendment that would rewrite the article regarding corporations was held up over technical concerns about its language. Also, Speaker Pro Tempore Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham, and state Sen.
Ted Little, D-Auburn, have reintroduced legislation that would allow voters
to decide whether to call a convention to overhaul the constitution. A bill that
would give county commissions in Alabama the power to regulate quarriesdoesn't
solve the real problem: the lack of home rule for county governments The correct quarry of any bill that would affect quarries ought to be the Alabama Constitution. Confused? So, too, are the well-meaning people pushing for a bill that
would require quarries to get approval from county commissions or town
councils to locate in areas that don't have zoning. In other words, most
of unincorporated Alabama. Just three of Alabama's 67 counties have the
power to zone in unincorporated areas: Jefferson County and parts of Shelby
and Baldwin counties. Great-grandson
of 1901 Alabama Constitution author wants it rewritten Archibald Hill Carmichael was born in 1864. He grew up during Reconstruction, became a lawyer and entered politics. His political career would take him both to Montgomery, where he became speaker of the Alabama House, and Washington, D.C., as a U.S. representative for Alabama's 8th Congressional District. Archibald Hill Carmichael was also one of the 155 favored men who convened
in the summer of 1901 to write a new state constitution to replace the
Alabama Constitution of 1875. Another reason
we need reform: Amending Constitution, again Alabamas state Constitution has been amended 799 times. By now, one would think we would have gotten it right. But thats not the case. In 2008, we will have the opportunity to add 25 more amendments to the ever-expanding list. In case you do not know why our Constitution has been amended so many
times, heres why: The rat in
ratification THE ISSUE: Alabamians voted on the 1901 Constitution 106 years ago today.
Only through massive voter fraud in the Black Belt were there enough votes
to ratify this grievously flawed document. Alabamians
should not fear reform, but the lack thereof Halloween may be over, but still the boogey man lurks around every corner if you listen to opponents of constitutional reform in this state. Hes been there in the shadows for more than a century now, threatening the balance of power in Alabama. He comes in different forms taxes, gambling, anything that might scare an Alabamian into thinking hes better protected by a constitution that really renders him powerless. That point isnt lost in a new documentary, Its A Thick
Book, which underscores the fallacy that a document to disenfranchise
poor white and black voters in 1901 could protect the masses today. 'It's a thick
book' Reform movement is afoot to rewrite the Alabama Constitution Alabama’s Constitution of 1901, the state’s current governing document,
is the longest such charter on earth. None of the state constitutions
from any of the other 49 states even come close. According to Wikipedia,
it is twice as long as India’s constitution, which is currently the largest
national governing document in the world. Constitution
reform calls for courage State constitutions are meant to serve as the most vital organs of state government. The law of the land, and all that. The principal principles. If Alabama's constitution were an organ it would be an infected and swollen
appendix. It hurts like the dickens, and it just might kill us if we don't
cut the bloated thing out. Another reason
our Constitution stinks: The smell from up north Of the many complaints lodged against our current constitutional arrangement,
one of the most frequent is the difficulty that local governments face
when they want to regulate things in their own back yards. Could it happen
here? Down in south Alabama, near the town of Atmore, a mini-drama is being played out that should be watched by rural residents throughout the state. Escambia County is in the heart of the pine belt. Timber has been its livelihood as long as there have been people there. And like so many similar counties, Escambia is pockmarked with clusters of houses that residents consider to be communities but in a legal sense are little more than neighborhoods. Freemanville is one of these. In Alabama,
reform is slow, but it truly can happen If you doubt that the reform movement is alive and well in Alabama, you obviously weren't in the Harbert Center in downtown Birmingham on Thursday. There, hundreds of citizens - prominent and not so prominent - from all over Alabama gathered in a third-floor ballroom for a pivotal event: the first annual Bailey Thomson Awards Luncheon. The event was sponsored by the Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform
Foundation, an offshoot of the Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform. Long trek
to reform worth it Reform in Alabama is not a sprint, it is an endurance race. The folks in our state who are striving to replace our outdated, inadequate
and immoral constitution got a second or third or fourth wind Thursday
at an event honoring some of the pioneers in this long journey. The energy
and enthusiasm from that gathering should fuel at least a few more laps
around the track Constitutional
reformers honor Thomson BIRMINGHAM -- Advocates for reforming Alabama's 1901 constitution gathered
Thursday to honor a pioneer of the movement and to urge more progress
in changing what they believe is a dysfunctional and antiquated document. Constitutional
reform bid pushed Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Cynthia Tucker on Thursday encouraged about 400 advocates of replacing Alabama's 1901 constitution to keep the faith, even if progress is slow. "We've come a mighty long way," the Monroeville native told a luncheon audience at Birmingham's Harbert Center. "We have a mighty long way to go, but please, don't be discouraged by the journey." Organized by Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform, the first annual
Bailey Thomson Awards Luncheon was held to celebrate progress made toward
constitutional reform and to honor contributors to the movement. Reforming
state constitution key to solving problems, says campaigner Many of the big problems in Alabama stem from a single 106-year-old source, according to a spokesman for Greater Birmingham Ministries. It's Alabama's 1901 Constitution. "When you really get to talking about a way to solve the major problems in Alabama, that way is the Alabama Constitution," said Hill Carmichael, coordinator of the group's constitutional reform campaign. "Whether you're talking about public transportation or tax reform -- pretty much anything you talk about -- it's the constitution. The way we say it is, the constitution is every issue and every issue is the constitution." On Aug. 30, Greater Birmingham Ministries will be honored for its campaign
at the first-ever Bailey Thomson Awards Luncheon in Birmingham, sponsored
by the Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform Foundation. A limited
cleanup New law points up the need to reform the constitution While the rest of the country may judge Alabama as anachronistic because
of the recent legislative punch-out, it would probably be more surprised
to learn that some counties are just getting around to imposing and enforcing
laws that regulate the accumulation of junk on private property. Letting local
governments govern THE ISSUE: It shouldn't take Prichard or any other city or county three
years to get something done, but that's often the case because of Alabama's
awful constitution. Number 800:
It's a travesty to all citizens of this state I have an 800 number for you, but I don't suggest that you call it -
because you can't. The 800 number is the number Alabama is rapidly approaching
in its total aggregation of state constitutional amendments. A fraudulent
constitution THE ISSUE: This past week 106 years ago, the 1901 Constitution's framers
began drafting the document that would constrain Alabama's people and
its governments. Isn't it ironic? THE ISSUE: The Alabama Farmers Federation helped kill a bill that would let voters have their say on a new constitution. Lawmakers who voted Alfa's way said they saved voters from special interests. Tuesday, a powerful special-interest group flexed its muscles in the Legislature to help kill a bill its opponents said would let powerful special-interest groups flex their muscles in the Legislature. The irony is likely lost on opponents of a new state constitution who
ensured, for another year, there won't be one. Elected
officials don't trust voters Democracy
loses another round This looked like the year that the Legislature would vote to allow Alabamians
to decide if they wanted a convention to write a new Constitution. It
didn't happen. The sponsor of the bill, Rep. Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham,
pulled the proposal Tuesday when he realized that he did not have the
votes on a procedural measure that had to pass to bring the convention
plan to the floor. Good reason
to be unhappy THE ISSUE: The state House of Representatives needs to take the next step toward a new constitution by approving a bill that would "let the people vote." Whatever their T-shirts lacked in taste, they made up for it by being right on message: "We're unhappy because our constitution is crappy." Many of those gathered Wednesday on the steps of the state Capitol sported
the bright red shirt. The crowd of about 120 people, mostly college students,
was there to rally for a bill that would let voters decide whether they
want a citizens convention to write a new Alabama Constitution. House may
set Feb 5. for vote MONTGOMERY - The state House of Representatives next week likely will vote on a plan that would let state voters decide Feb. 5 whether to call a convention of 210 delegates to rewrite the state constitution, said Rep. Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham. Newton is the second-ranking House member. He said the plan, which he
is sponsoring, likely will come up for debate and possible approval Tuesday
or Wednesday. Constitution
reform gains momentum Convention
bill could come to vote next week, speaker pro tem says MONTGOMERY -- A bill that would allow Alabamians to decide whether to call a constitutional convention could come to a vote in the House of Representatives as early as next week. Speaker Pro Tem Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham, the sponsor of the legislation, said at a constitutional convention rally Wednesday that the bill would pass if it can get past a vote on a budget isolation resolution, a procedural requirement on all legislation taken up before the state's budgets. "If we get the votes on the BIR, we'll pass it," he said. "And
I certainly wouldn't want to be one of the folks to vote against the BIR,
even if I was on the other side." Lawmakers:
Heed call for constitutional reform convention Dueling efforts at constitutional reform in Alabama ought to tell voters and lawmakers something. The momentum is building once again for change in any form. State Rep. Paul DeMarco, R-Homewood, is following the years-long lead of the late Jack Venable, a state representative who fought until his death for changing the constitution one article at a time. It couldnt be done then, and its prospects of success in the future are none too encouraging. Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham, is renewing his fight to change the constitution in its entirety through a constitutional convention of citizens. If we get a vote, we cast ours for the latter. It represents what democracy is supposed to be about giving the people a chance to have a say in their own government. In reality, the people have already spoken. In polls, in resolutions,
in petitions, they say they want a new constitution. They want a constitution
that puts the power back in their hands, not in those of special interests
and a select group of lawmakers in Montgomery. Piecemeal
reform not the best way: Redo all of the Constitution For years the late Rep. Jack Venable argued that Alabamas Constitution needed to be rewritten. But Venable, ever a member of the Statehouse gang, felt the rewriting should be done by the Legislature article by article. Venable even got some of his proposals passed in the House, but as has been so often the case in years past, reform bogged down in the Senate. Sadly, Venable is no longer with us, but his torch has been picked up
by Rep. Paul DeMarco, R-Homewood, who has introduced bills that would
rewrite the banking and corporation portions of the document. James L. Evans:
Let the people decide The minister who mentored me used to say, Jim, don't be afraid to trust the people. His reference, of course, was to the many decisions Baptist congregations make week in and week out. These decisions range from what color to paint the fellowship hall to who will serve as leaders in the church. People who are committed to the well-being of the church, my mentor would say, have a way of making the right decision. After serving Baptist churches now for more than 30 years I have no reason to doubt that wisdom. People of good faith and good will can be trusted to do the right thing. We may not be perfect, but for the most part we manage to stay on a good and faithful path. I can't help but believe that the same is true for larger and more diverse
communities-like the state of Alabama, for instance. I understand that
there are special-interest groups who are only interested in what affects
their interests. I also know that these interest groups often hold great
sway over our elected leaders and have significant resources for persuading
the public at large. But I believe that most of the people in our state
who are trying to live meaningful lives also are capable of thinking for
themselves. Constitution
convention bill clears panel MONTGOMERY - State voters would decide Feb. 5 whether to call a convention of 210 delegates to rewrite the state constitution, under a bill approved Wednesday by a legislative panel. The Constitution and Elections Committee of the state House of Representatives voted 8-5 for the plan sponsored by Rep. Demetrius Newton, D-Birmingham. Newton said he was pleased, especially since the same committee killed
a similar bill he sponsored last year. "I think it's a first step
in the right direction." Bills offer
hope for constitutional rewrite IF THE Alabama constitution were a truck, it would be a 1901 wooden wagon pulled by big mules, because no one made a pickup before 1902. The mules would be old and skinny, hardly capable of pulling the bloated constitution that has acquired so many amendments (more than 700) that it has become the longest constitution in the nation. The wood slats and bottom of the 1901 wagon would be rotted, mildewed and broken. The wheels would be rusted and bent, the harness decayed and patched together. It wouldn't serve the needs of 21st century Alabamians any better than
the real constitution does. Persistence
can win To get things done in Alabama in the realm of public policy, you have
to be persistent - very persistent. And someday it can pay
off. 1901
Constitution holds back state The Montgomery Advertiser urges citizens to take opportunity to
view "It's a Big Book," documentary on Alabama's Constitution. Courting a
new state constitution THE ISSUE: The Circuit Judges Association hops aboard the bandwagon for
a new fundamental charter for Alabama. There's still lots of room left,
especially for legislators' constituents. Road
Issue Another Case for Reform The Montgomery Advertiser had an excellent editorial on Friday,
January 19, 2007 on the need for constitutional reform titled "Road Issue
Another Case for Reform". State haunted
by 1901 constitution According to the Alabama Constitution of 1901, "The state shall not engage in works of internal improvements." What an amazing document. It clearly and unabashedly prohibits our state from improving itself. Why does our constitution forbid improvement, when no other state constitution
prohibits progress? The answer is simple: The framers of Alabama's infamous
fundamental law did not want to benefit the citizens in any way, shape
or form. Will '07 bring
new Constitution? Despite the fact that polls show a majority of Alabamians support efforts
to rewrite our antiquated Constitution; despite the fact that the state's
democratic heritage all but demands that Alabamians be given the opportunity
to vote on how this rewriting would be done; and despite the fact that
Alabama legislators are elected by the same people who want to vote on
this issue; last year enough of these representatives blocked legislation
that would give citizens the right to choose. A rhyme for
Alabama 'Twas a few days before Christmas Constitution
costs Prichard Mobile, Alabama SOMETHING GOOD could come out of the recent defeat of an amendment that
would have allowed Prichard to set up a tariff-free trading zone, if the
defeat spurs the Legislature to change the rules governing local constitutional
amendments. Even
more reasons for new constitution We need another reason to rewrite this state's 1901 Constitution like
Mal Moore needs another suggestion about who the next University of Alabama
football coach should be. But here are a few more arguments for a new
fundamental charter to add atop a pile as deep as the intrigue over the
search for Mike Shula's replacement: Will 2007
be the year for constitutional reform? MONTGOMERY - Advocates of constitutional reform say the door was opened in 2006. In 2007, they think they have the best chance in years to kick it open. Home rule's
coming, but the process is slow STATE CONSTITUTIONAL reform might be the only way to bring limited home
rule to counties throughout Alabama. While voters in several counties,
including Mobile and Baldwin, have approved home rule, voters in other
counties seem reluctant to give their county officials more power. Op-Ed Columns Dear Gov. Riley: Congratulations on your re-election as our governor. Your 58 percent
margin is the largest since 1982 when Alabama governor races started being
competitive. For my part, I'm glad you won. You have demonstrated understanding
about the needs of the poor in our state and have taken significant steps
to address their needs. The Election's
No. 1 issue It as been more than a decade since the late Bailey Thomson wrote a searing
series of articles that called attention to the fact that so many of Alabama's
problems stem from the much-amended 1901 Constitution that hamstrung local
government, limited the state's ability to fund services and centralized
power in Montgomery, where special interests once known as the Big Mules
could sidetrack any change they did not want made. Looking for
answers THE ISSUE: Constitutional reformers met Thursday to plan their 2007 strategy
for a new Alabama Constitution. Six weeks after Rondel Rhone became a Clarke County commissioner 14 years ago, he found out what it's like to feel powerless. One of his constituents had just spent a lot of money fixing up her home for her coming retirement. Then the earthmoving equipment began digging nearby, readying for an all-night truck stop. The woman asked Rhone what the County Commission could do. "I sympathized with her," he said. "I told her, unfortunately, there is nothing we can do." There was nothing the Clarke County Commission could do because the 1901
Constitution of Alabama wouldn't allow it. ... ASCR works
to get support for change With the state election just a month away and neither gubernatorial candidate
Constitutional
reform game plan eyed Montgomery - People who want Alabama to have a new constitution must
make Still
waiting for a people's vote THE ISSUE: The Legislature refused to let voters decide in November whether
they want a citizens convention to draft a new state constitution. Fortunately,
ACCR is making sure the issue doesn't go away. Had the Alabama Legislature done its job this year, Thursday's annual meeting of the Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform would be one of celebration, of anticipation, of commitment. Celebrating the chance for Alabamians to vote Nov. 7 on whether to allow
a convention of citizens to write a new state constitution. Anticipating
the outcome of the vote. And committing to work tirelessly for the next
month to ensure the measure passed. Constitutional
reform should move to forefront again A little more than a month remains before the Nov. 7 general election
in Alabama. It is decision time once again for voters in the state, but
it’s more than a choice between candidates, it’s about deciding whether
or not your voice will one day be heard. Limited home
rule gains momentum We've said over and over again. Local issues facing local people need to be handled locally. But across this state, Alabamians continue to keep that power in the hands of lawmakers in Montgomery. It is another remnant of a constitution that serves few but the most powerful in the capital city. It's called home rule, and few counties have the power to use it to decide
such basic issues as barking dogs, litter, weeds and other health and
safety problems. Why? Because Alabama's constitution is written to ensure
that even the most basic of problems must come before state lawmakers
to get permission to solve them. Backdoor
reform In case you missed it (and we did), Alabama got itself a little constitutional reform this year. It came in an area where we badly need it home rule. For this, you can thank the Association of County Commissioners of Alabama
and the voters of Mobile, Autauga, Dallas, Jackson and Marshall counties. Voters inch
toward constitution reform MONTGOMERY -- Without changing Alabama's oft-criticized 1901 constitution, voters in Mobile and four other counties this month inched toward fixing what many consider one of the document's most troublesome flaws. Those primary voters empowered their county commissioners to make someone address nuisances such as unsanitary sewage, noise, litter and rubbish, pollution, overgrown weeds, junkyards and unrestrained animals. For years, reform advocates have said the 1901 constitution denies "home
rule" to counties and favors special interests by centralizing power
in Montgomery. Its restrictions have led to nearly 800 constitutional
amendments, many pertaining to single localities. Wisdom from
the mouths of babes This space, as any frequent visitor can attest, cares a great deal about reforming Alabama's Constitution. Why? Because all sensible Alabamians know it severely limits Alabama — its people, its functions of government, its learning institutions, its businesses. Untie our hands from the bindings of the 1901 Constitution — which was created to protect the interests of the wealthy and to oppress African-Americans — and there's no telling how far we can go. Friends of constitutional reform, take heart. A youth movement agrees
with us. It's right there in The Star's Graduation Special 2006 publication..
Constitution
conundrum Maybe it's wrong to believe there's a place for logic in the Legislature. But there must be some logical way to explain why voters in November won't be able to decide whether they want a citizens convention to write a new Alabama constitution. Most lawmakers, remember, wanted no part in this year's legislative session
of a proposed constitutional amendment that would have given voters the
choice. A new poll suggests those lawmakers ignored the will of the people
- of both major political parties. New hope for
reform State voters may actually be way ahead of their legislators Last week, when the Alabama Legislature ended its 2006 regular session, the prospects for constitutional reform seemed dead - again. Lawmakers refused even to let the voters decide whether to call a constitutional convention. Anti-reform interests appeared to have the issue in a stranglehold. But now there's new hope. Legislature
2006: Winners and losers Back at the beginning of the session, we did a series of editorials on
the various agendas the state’s special interests were going to push to
have passed. Now, with the session behind us, we can look over what was
accomplished and see who won, who lost and who ended up with half a loaf. Off the hook Wednesday, the Alabama Senate concurred with the House on a resolution to name a rest stop on Interstate 65 after Guy Hunt. Senators also commended newspaper publisher Carol Pappas on being elected president of the Alabama Press Association. And they congratulated the Patrician Academy Lady Saints basketball team on winning the AISA 2A state basketball championship. But the Senate had no time to debate a bill that would let voters choose
in November whether Alabama needs a convention of citizens to write a
new constitution. Trusting voters,
or maybe not This week, Alabama' K-12 schools are out for spring break. So, too, is the Legislature. For Alabama voters - at least those who remained home this week - it
is as good a chance as any to cross paths with their lawmakers, many of
whom are using the time to campaign for re-election. Tax fears
still threaten reform A new statewide poll indicates a strong level of support for a new state
constitution, but also reflects broad concern over taxation. The latter
finding is especially important, as it reflects the indefatigable efforts
of anti-reform forces to paint the constitutional reform movement as a
scheme to raise taxes. Alabama at
a tipping point Gov. Bob Riley, speaking before members of the Alabama Press Association
in Montgomery on Saturday, launched into his familiar refrain. Just because
he says it often, though, doesn't mean it's not important. Senate panel
backs bill to allow vote on constitution convention MONTGOMERY - State voters could decide Nov. 7 whether to call a convention that could propose a new state constitution, under a bill passed Tuesday by a Senate committee. The Senate's constitution and elections committee voted 10-0 for the
bill. It next could be voted on by the full 35-member Senate as soon as
Thursday, if the agenda-setting Senate Rules Committee were to give it
priority. A special
(interest) vote One vote does not a statesman make, but boy, it can unmask a politician beholden to Montgomery's powerful special interests. That's the message of a House committee's vote Wednesday on a bill to
let voters decide in November whether they want a citizens convention
to write a new Alabama Constitution. The House Constitution and Elections
Committee deadlocked 7-7, keeping the bill from going to the full House
for a vote. Legislators
stand out for different reasons FOUR LEGISLATORS from Mobile and Baldwin counties distinguished themselves in the Legislature this week. Unfortunately, only Rep. Steve McMillan, R-Gulf Shores, deserves praise. The other three Reps. Joseph Mitchell, D-Mobile, Randy Davis,
R-Daphne, and Joe Faust, R-Fairhope marked themselves by working
against south Alabama. How long,
Alabama? As many times before, constitutional reform seems headed nowhere Every year, the Alabama Legislature is asked to set into motion the procedures
that would allow Alabama voters to write a new constitution. Every year,
the Alabama Legislature refuses. This year appears to be no exception. Trust today's
Alabamians to draft a modern constitution Letting the people decide something terrifies those who don't want change, especially if they are benefiting from the way things are. That's what is happening with a proposal to move toward rewriting Alabama's
outdated state constitution by calling a convention. The proposal died
last week by a 7-7 vote of the House Constitution and Elections Committee,
with Rep. Micky Hammon, R-Decatur, among those voting against it. Losing on
a tie vote Tie goes to the runner in baseball, but in legislation a tie vote is a loser. Constitutional reform in Alabama suffered a loss Wednesday in Montgomery. It was just a committee vote on an issue that hasn't energized Alabama
citizens, but the 7-7 vote in the House Constitution and Elections Committee
is another frustrating setback for constitutional reform advocates in
the state. Constitutional
reform stalls as referendum is denied MONTGOMERY -- Reformers must find another path toward a citizen convention
to rewrite the state's 1901 Constitution after an Alabama House panel
deadlocked at 7-7 Wednesday, effectively killing a bill that would allow
a public referendum on the matter. Politicians
don't trust people to vote wisely OVER THE years, Alabama politicians have offered an assortment of excuses for why they aren't interested in rewriting the state constitution. None of the excuses -- which range from "We can fix it via the amendment
process" to "There's nothing wrong with centralizing power in Montgomery"
-- holds water. But the weakest has got to be (and we're paraphrasing
here), "Let the people decide? Are you crazy?" State constitution
debate renewed in public hearing on bill Issue matters
more than this New drive
for a new constitution The drive has begun anew for lawmakers to give Alabamians a chance to
vote on whether they are ready to chuck the state's massive state constitution,
a document crafted in 1901 to lock power in the state capital. Opposing sides
face off over state constitution Rally
to urge new constitution Constitutional
reform ought to be priority in state Voters should
decide whether they want a new constitution Why wait for
reform? If Iraq gets
a new constitution, why not Alabama? A matter of
trust All those candidates are trusting the people to make the right decision in their races. But how much do the candidates, particularly those running for legislative seats, really trust the people? One way to find out is by watching what happens in the Legislature to
a proposed amendment to the Alabama Constitution that would let voters
choose in November whether they want a convention of citizens to write
a new constitution. ACCR to rally
Jan. 25 The Alabama
Constitution of 1901: Lawmakers have a chance to put rewrite of constitution
in the hands of the people Hope for reform
still alive Hearing set
on constitutional convention bill If Iraq gets
new constitution, why not us? On Amendment
Two Constitutional reform group to be out at polls Is it time for a rewrite? Group
still pushes new constitution Plus or minus
One — Our problems are still with us State's
husky constitution could add 35 amendments Reform revitalized Constitution
reform takes a back seat Senate
approves limited home rule for counties Group
rallies support for constitutional reform Suppressing silliness
Home rule amendment
to be presented once again |
||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2007 |
Top | Home | |||||||||||||||||